Compare and contrast Durkheims and Marxs analysis of Punishment in Essay

Compare and contrast Durkheims and Marxs analysis of Punishment in Modern Society - probe ExampleAccording to the paperpunishment can be referred to as just aboutthing that is painful. Punishment is something unpleasant imposed by an federal agency on an offender because of some wrongdoing. The purpose of punishment is to give justice to the victim and to discourage other good deal from following the same action in the future. If there is no authority involved then the action is more of a revenge than or an act of hostility rather than a punishment.This paper highlights thatDurkheim introduced two concepts. Firstly, societies evolved from mechanical (simple and non-specialized) to constitutive(a) (complex and specialized). In a mechanical society people think and behave alike, and have the same goals. As a society becomes organic, its work becomes more complex, and the people are independent and impersonal. Secondly, he made a surprising argument that anomie would be worse in q uantify of prosperity than in times of recession. His argument was that as prosperity increases, desires increase. At the same time, traditional rules have lost their authority. Individuals cannot find their place in the society without clear rules to help them.In the long run, criminals and crimes are a necessary part of the society for its evolution and development of law and morality. Therefore, in this sense it is useful. Not only does it help in differentiating between right and wrong, but it also has a vanguard quality. According to Durkheim, crime can appear as an anticipation of the morality to come.